{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[{"id":"37907498","dateCreated":"1303250612","smartDate":"Apr 19, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"Shawn.Conlon","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Shawn.Conlon","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37907498"},"dateDigested":1532145562,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Emerging Design","description":"Emerging Design
\nCreswell, J. W. (2008) Educational Research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey, Pearson Education, Inc. (Ch 14, p. 442)
\nDefinition: Emerging design is a grounded theory concept that allows the researcher to analyze data as it is collected, rather than waiting to analyze it after it has all been collected. Employing this technique permits the researcher to change the direction or focus of data collection.
\nExample: A researcher is conducting interview asking people about A, B and C. However, upon examining the initial data, it becomes clear that A is not important, but D is germane to the research question. The researcher may change the interview design to include questions about B, C, and D.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37907206","dateCreated":"1303250187","smartDate":"Apr 19, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"Shawn.Conlon","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Shawn.Conlon","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37907206"},"dateDigested":1532145562,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Saturation","description":"Saturation
\nCreswell, J. W. (2008) Educational Research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey, Pearson Education, Inc. (Ch 14, p. 443)
\nDefinition: Saturation is a concept employed in grounded theory research that wherein a researcher may make a determination that no further research data need be collected in order to organize or create categories.
\nExample: A researcher planned to interview 150 people about a particular research question. Of the 150 scheduled interviews, 25 people were no-shows. The researcher may decide, after examining the data on the first 124, that rescheduling the missed interviews is not important, since clear categories have arisen from the first 125 interviews","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37889454","dateCreated":"1303230813","smartDate":"Apr 19, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"Rendos","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Rendos","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37889454"},"dateDigested":1532145562,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Theoretical Lens","description":"Theoretical Lens
\n
\nCH 16 pp. 515
\n
\nDefinition
\n
\nThe procedures that the researcher follow to create, administer, and write up their research.
\n
\nDr. Phillips theoretical lense is primarily quantitative in nature.
\n
\nCreswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37889194","dateCreated":"1303230577","smartDate":"Apr 19, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"Rendos","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Rendos","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37889194"},"dateDigested":1532145562,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Interview survey","description":"Interview survey
\n
\nChapter 13 pp 394
\n
\ndefinition
\n
\nA survey made up by the researcher to get important information from the participants, this can be a wide range of information.
\n
\nExample
\n
\nEvery individual in the sexual dysfunction study had to take a interview survey to determine the severity of their problem.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37888750","dateCreated":"1303230200","smartDate":"Apr 19, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"Rendos","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Rendos","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37888750"},"dateDigested":1532145562,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Gatekeeper","description":"Gatekeeper
\n
\nchapter 8 pp 219
\n
\nDefinition
\n
\nThese are the people that allow access to the participants. An example would be the school board and administrators to allow access to researchers.
\n
\nThe gatekeeper of the school, the principle, was difficult to appease for the assessment.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\nCreswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37888484","dateCreated":"1303229864","smartDate":"Apr 19, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"Rendos","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Rendos","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37888484"},"dateDigested":1532145562,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Interrater Reliability","description":"Interrater Reliability
\n
\nChapter 6, pp. 171
\n
\nDefinition - it the process of have 2 people observe the same behavior. They then compare the scores to see if they are the same. Similar scores would show good interrater reliability.
\n
\nThe interrater reliability on the Devereux Behavior Scale showed consistentcy through the assessment.
\n
\n
\nCreswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37870300","dateCreated":"1303193068","smartDate":"Apr 18, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"saj04e","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/saj04e","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37870300"},"dateDigested":1532145563,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Covariates & Triangulation","description":"Syreeta Amanda Jones
\nTerm 1: COVARIATES
\n
\nCreswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. (Chapter 11, pg. 302)
\n
\nTextbook Definition \u2013 variables that the researcher controls for using statistics and that relate to the dependent variable but that do not relate to the independent variable.
\n
\nStudent-friendly Definition \u2013 qualities, traits, or aspects (variables) of the experiment that the researcher tries to control or limit, using statistics, that have an unknown or unaccounted-for affect on the dependent variable only.
\n
\nExample \u2013 Teachers were assigned to two different training courses, one concerning specific behavioral interventions for children diagnosed with ADHD and the other concerning general behavior modification principles. Teachers were given a pretest & posttest concerning their attitudes toward training in behavioral interventions for children with ADHD. Covariate: Teachers who believe ADHD is inherent and cannot be changed with behavior interventions.
\n
\nSyreeta Amanda Jones
\nTerm 2: TRIANGULATION
\n
\nCreswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. (Chapter 9, pg. 266)
\n
\nTextbook Definition \u2013 the process of corroborating evidence from different individuals, types of data, or methods of data collection in descriptions and themes in qualitative research.
\n
\nStudent-friendly Definition \u2013 once the results of a study are in, the researcher \u201cdouble-checks\u201d the results to ensure accuracy of their study. This is not checking the results from the same source but from additional sources. It is a way to get more support for the findings. Triangulation is one of many ways to \u201cdouble-check\u201d. The key is using different sources to get information.
\n
\nExample \u2013 Researchers received results from their \u201cEducator Attitudes about RtI Survey\u201d. They conclude that the sample of teachers view RtI negatively. They can extend the survey to school principals (source 1-individuals) in addition to the teachers, or interview (source 2-method of data collection) teachers and\/or principals.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37779518","dateCreated":"1302985483","smartDate":"Apr 16, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"amo09e","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/amo09e","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37779518"},"dateDigested":1532145563,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Institutional Review Board","description":"Institutional Review Board:
\nCreswell, J. (2008). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. (Chapter 6, pgs. 157-158).
\n
\n\u201cStudent Friendly Definition\u201d: A committee made up of faculty members that review research proposals that will use human subjects. The purpose of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to evaluate and approve research proposals that preserve and protect the rights of human subjects. Approval from the IRB has been federally mandated since the 1970\u2019s in order to prevent the abuse of human subjects in research. The exact process of gaining IRB approval varies depending on the institution or campus that the research is being conducted at.
\nExample: If you were working with a team of faculty members at FSU to conduct an experiment on the effectiveness of a new treatment program on improving symptoms of ADHD in college students, you would need to identify the individuals that sit on the FSU IRB, become familiar with the requirements for review process, determine what information the review board needs about your study, and submit a description of your proposed study to the IRB. Generally, this description should include; the study\u2019s purpose, research methodology and data-collection process, how you will guarantee the protection of participant\u2019s rights, and a sample of your informed consent form.
\n
\n-Amber O'Shea","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37779500","dateCreated":"1302985449","smartDate":"Apr 16, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"amo09e","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/amo09e","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37779500"},"dateDigested":1532145563,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Realist Ethnography","description":"Realist Ethnography
\nCreswell, J. (2008). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. (Chapter 15, pgs. 475-476).
\n
\n\u201cStudent Friendly Definition\u201d: Realist Ethnography is an approach where the researcher reports a detailed and third-person account of a situation. The report is delivered in an objective tone free of personal bias and includes information about the setting, situation, and population, which was directly observed at a field site. Direct quotes are sometimes used in Realist Ethnography to accurately report on the studied population.
\nExample of Realist Ethnography: Realist Ethnography is frequently used in the field of cultural anthropology. For example, if a researcher were interested in learning more about the daily activities, traditions, values, and beliefs of a different culture, they may use this technique by staying with the selected population and recording objective data and cultural descriptions (i.e. vocational activities, social status systems, family dynamics).
\n
\n-Amber O'Shea","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"37779484","dateCreated":"1302985416","smartDate":"Apr 16, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"amo09e","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/amo09e","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/drbphillips.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/37779484"},"dateDigested":1532145563,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Grounded Theory","description":"Grounded Theory
\nCreswell, J. (2008). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. (Chapter 14, pg. 432-434).
\n
\n\u201cStudent Friendly Definition\u201d: Grounded theory designs help to form a theory that explains a process, action, or interaction. Grounded theory designs are to be used when you need to develop a new theory about a process, because pre-existing theories are not sufficient at addressing the topic or problem. Grounded theory design requires rigorous quantitative features and provides detailed systematic procedures for analyzing data, making it helpful to beginning researchers.
\nExample of Grounded Theory: An example of when you would use a grounded theory design is if you were interested in looking at the career decision making process in adults with spinal cord injuries.
\n
\n-Amber O'Shea","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]}],"more":true},"comments":[]},"http":{"code":200,"status":"OK"},"redirectUrl":null,"javascript":null,"notices":{"warning":[],"error":[],"info":[],"success":[]}}